United States v. Doyle, 6:12-cr-00036. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20200122981
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER J. CAMPBELL BARKER , District Judge . In this criminal case, defendant's supervised release was revoked, and she was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Doc. 186. On November 21, 2019, defendant moved the court to remove her federal detainer. Doc. 187. The motion was referred to a magistrate judge. On December 3, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love issued a report recommending that the motion be denied (Doc. 190), and defendant has not objected to the report. Because sh
Summary: ORDER J. CAMPBELL BARKER , District Judge . In this criminal case, defendant's supervised release was revoked, and she was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Doc. 186. On November 21, 2019, defendant moved the court to remove her federal detainer. Doc. 187. The motion was referred to a magistrate judge. On December 3, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love issued a report recommending that the motion be denied (Doc. 190), and defendant has not objected to the report. Because she..
More
ORDER
J. CAMPBELL BARKER, District Judge.
In this criminal case, defendant's supervised release was revoked, and she was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. Doc. 186. On November 21, 2019, defendant moved the court to remove her federal detainer. Doc. 187. The motion was referred to a magistrate judge. On December 3, 2019, United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love issued a report recommending that the motion be denied (Doc. 190), and defendant has not objected to the report. Because she has not objected, defendant is not entitled to a de novo review by the district judge. Douglass v. United States Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996). Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation and denies defendant's motion.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
