Murdock v. Bruce, 3:12-cv-1244. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20160308d79
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 97), recommending that Plaintiff Marshall H. Murdock's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 84) be denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 56.01. The R & R also recommended that Defendants' Motion to Strike (Docket No. 90) be denied as moot. Plaintiff has not objected to the R & R. Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district j
Summary: ORDER KEVIN H. SHARP , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 97), recommending that Plaintiff Marshall H. Murdock's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 84) be denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 56.01. The R & R also recommended that Defendants' Motion to Strike (Docket No. 90) be denied as moot. Plaintiff has not objected to the R & R. Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district ju..
More
ORDER
KEVIN H. SHARP, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 97), recommending that Plaintiff Marshall H. Murdock's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 84) be denied for failure to comply with Local Rule 56.01. The R & R also recommended that Defendants' Motion to Strike (Docket No. 90) be denied as moot. Plaintiff has not objected to the R & R.
Where no objections are made to the R & R, "[t]he district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions." FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
Having conducted a de novo review in accordance with Rule 72, the Court will accept the disposition set forth in the R & R. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 97) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 84) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
(3) Defendants' Motion to Strike (Docket No. 90) is DENIED AS MOOT.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
