Stanich v. Quick Collect, Inc., 3:17-CV-01693-JR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20181211c26
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [24] on September 10, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [13]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the r
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERN NDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [24] on September 10, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [13]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the re..
More
ORDER
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [24] on September 10, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [13]. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [13] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
