U.S. v. HUGHES, 1:10-cr-13. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20150505e61
Visitors: 1
Filed: May 04, 2015
Latest Update: May 04, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM B. MITCHELL CARTER , Magistrate Judge . LISA D. HUGHES ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on May 4, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included: (1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government. (2) The Supervised Releasee. (3) Attorney Myrlene Marsa for defen
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM B. MITCHELL CARTER , Magistrate Judge . LISA D. HUGHES ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on May 4, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included: (1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government. (2) The Supervised Releasee. (3) Attorney Myrlene Marsa for defend..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WILLIAM B. MITCHELL CARTER, Magistrate Judge.
LISA D. HUGHES ("Supervised Releasee") appeared for an initial appearance before the undersigned on May 4, 2015, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision ("Petition"). Those present for the hearing included:
(1) An Assistant United States Attorney for the Government.
(2) The Supervised Releasee.
(3) Attorney Myrlene Marsa for defendant.
After being sworn in due form of law, the Supervised Releasee was informed or reminded of her privilege against self-incrimination accorded her under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It was determined the Supervised Releasee wished to be represented by an attorney and she qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent her at government expense. Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee, Inc. was APPOINTED to represent the defendant. It was determined the Supervised Releasee had been provided with a copy of the Petition and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with her attorney. It was also determined she was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents she had been provided
The Supervised Releasee waived her right to a preliminary hearing and detention hearing.
The Government moved the Supervised Releasee be detained pending a hearing to determine whether her term of supervision should be revoked.
Findings
(1) Based upon the Petition and Supervised Releasee's waiver of preliminary hearing and detention hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe the Supervised Releasee has committed violations of her conditions of supervised release as alleged in the petition.
Conclusions
It is ORDERED:
(1) The Supervised Releasee shall appear in a revocation hearing before U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier.
(2) The motion of the Government that defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending her revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.
(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport the Supervised Releasee to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Thursday, July 16, 2015, at 9:00 am.
Source: Leagle
