Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re: CitX Corp Inc, 05-2760 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 05-2760 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-6-2006 In re: CitX Corp Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-2760 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "In re: CitX Corp Inc " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 802. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/802 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the Uni
More
Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-6-2006 In re: CitX Corp Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-2760 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "In re: CitX Corp Inc " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 802. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/802 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 05-2760 In Re: CITX CORPORATION, INC., Debtor GARY SEITZ, Chapter 7 Trustee for CitX Corporation, Inc., Appellant v. DETWEILER, HERSHEY AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.; ROBERT SCHOEN, C.P.A. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 03-cv-06766) District Judge: Honorable James T. Giles Argued April 27, 2006 Before: AMBRO and FUENTES, Circuit Judges, and IRENAS,* District Judge (Opinion filed: May 26, 2006) ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed * Honorable Joseph E. Irenas, Senior District Judge for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation. May 26, 2006, be amended as follows: On page 10, bottom paragraph, first line, replace “on this claim” with “on his malpractice claim”. On page 10, note 7, line three, replace the words “duty element” with “duty-owed element”. On page 12, full paragraph, line four, replace “one million dollars” with “$1,000,000”. On page 12, full paragraph, lines five and six, replace the sentence, “Rather, it lessened CitX’s insolvency.” with “It did the opposite.” On page 12, full paragraph, line eleven, replace the sentence, “This hardly deepened insolvency.” with “Insolvency decreased rather than deepened.”; and insert the word “later” after the word “Any”. On page 12, third paragraph, line four, replace the word “backward” with the words “through hindsight bias”. On page 13, lines four and five from the top of the page, replace “Put another way” with “In any event”. On page 20, second paragraph, line nine, replace the word “holding” with the words “interpreting Lafferty to hold”. By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: June 6, 2006 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer