Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Vallies v. Sky Bank, 05-1002 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 05-1002 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 01, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-1-2006 Vallies v. Sky Bank Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-1002 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Vallies v. Sky Bank" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1522. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1522 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the Unit
More
Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-1-2006 Vallies v. Sky Bank Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 05-1002 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Vallies v. Sky Bank" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1522. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1522 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 05-1002 __________ LOUIS R. VALLIES, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated vehicle buyers, Appellant v. SKY BANK, an Ohio Bank licensed to do business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Appellee ___________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Dist. Ct. Case No. 01-cv-1438) ___________ SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING __________ BEFORE: SMITH, STAPLETON and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges __________ The Petition for rehearing filed by the Appellee in the above-entitled matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court, is hereby GRANTED. A separate order amending the opinion in this appeal will be filed separately. It is so ordered. By the Court, /s/ Richard L. Nygaard ________________________ United States Circuit Judge DATE: February 1, 2006
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer