Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-25-2007 Taylor v. Horn Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-9016 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "Taylor v. Horn" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 324. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/324 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.  PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-9016 PAUL GAMBOA TAYLOR, Appellant v. MARTIN HORN, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; GREGORY R. WHITE, Superintendent of SCI Pittsburgh; JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, Superintendent of SCI Rockview On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 04-cv-00553) District Judge: Hon. James F. McClure, Jr. Argued October 18, 2006 BEFORE: BARRY, FUENTES, and ROTH, Circuit Judges (Filed September 20, 2007) Matthew C. Lawry, Esq. (Argued) Michael Wiseman Defender Association of Philadelphia Federal Capital Habeas Corpus Unit The Curtis Center, Suite 545 West 1 Independence Square West Philadelphia, PA 19106 Counsel for Paul Gamboa Taylor Stuart Suss, Esq. (Argued) Office of the Pennsylvania Attorney General Appeals and Legal Services Section 2490 Boulevard of the Generals Norristown, PA 19403 Counsel for Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections; Gregory White, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh; and Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed September 20, 2007, be amended as follows: On page 21, second line under A. Federal Competency Standards, remove “to” after “right” and before “not”. The phrase should read ... “due process right not to be tried, ...” By the Court, /s/ Julio M. Fuentes Circuit Judge DATED: September 25, 2007 2