Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Ayodeji, 04-4695 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 04-4695 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-20-2007 USA v. Ayodeji Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-4695 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "USA v. Ayodeji" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 911. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/911 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United Stat
More
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-20-2007 USA v. Ayodeji Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-4695 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "USA v. Ayodeji" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 911. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/911 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-4695 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES HILTON AYODEJI, Appellant (United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania No. 04-cr-00058) PRESENT: McKee, Ambro, and Stapleton, Circuit Judges Motion by Appellee, United States of America, to Retract the Opinion Issued on January 26, 2007 in the above Captioned Case and to Issue A Redacted Opinion ORDER The forgoing Motion is granted. The not precedential opinion issue on January 26, 2007 is hereby retracted. A redacted opinion will be issued as the opinion previously issued contained certain personal data identifiers. The Clerk is directed to contact the publishers of the legal reporters and the University of Villanova School of Law regarding the retraction of this opinion. The retraction and issuance of a redacted opinion does not modify the judgment issued by the Court. By the Court, /s/ Stapleton Circuit Judge Date: June 20, 2007
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer