Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re: Fortune, 06-4189 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 06-4189 Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 07, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-7-2007 In Re: Fortune Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4189 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "In Re: Fortune " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1510. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1510 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United St
More
Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-7-2007 In Re: Fortune Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4189 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "In Re: Fortune " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 1510. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/1510 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. BLD-128 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO. 06-4189 __________ IN RE: KENNETH FORTUNE, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to W.D. Pa. Civ. No. 04-cv-00377) _____________________________________ Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. February 16, 2007 Before: MCKEE, FUENTES and WEIS, CIRCUIT JUDGES (Filed: March 7, 2007) _______________________ OPINION _______________________ PER CURIAM. Pro se petitioner Kenneth Fortune seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to reach an immediate decision on his motion for contempt. Fortune filed his motion for contempt on June 20, 2006, requesting that the District Court hold the defendants in contempt for their failure to waive service and file a timely response to the complaint. On September 22, 2006, Fortune filed this petition 1 seeking a writ of mandamus.1 On October 16, 2006, the District Court entered an order denying Fortune’s motion for contempt. Because Fortune has received the relief he sought in filing his mandamus petition – a ruling on his motion for contempt– we will deny his mandamus petition as moot. 1 Fortune was subsequently granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, after he had filed the requisite financial affidavit. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer