Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-29-2008 PMC Film Canada Inc v. Shintech Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-5011 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008 Recommended Citation "PMC Film Canada Inc v. Shintech Inc" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1314. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1314 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT March 20, 2008 No. 06-5011 PMC Film Canada, Inc., Appellant vs. Shintech, Inc. (District of New Jersey - Trenton Civil No. 04-cv-05150) PRESENT: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, BARRY and ROTH, Circuit Judges 1. Motion by Appellee Shintech, Inc. for Clarification or, Alternatively, Correction of Opinion and Judgment. 2. Response by Appellant to Motion for Clarification or, Alternatively, Correction of Opinion and Judgment. 3. Reply by Appellee Shintech, Inc. in Support of Motion for Clarification or, Alternatively, Correction of Opinion and Judgment. /s/ LaToya Corprew Opinion/Judgment entered 02/20/08. LaToya Corprew Case Manager 267-299-4915 ORDER The foregoing motion is GRANTED, and the Opinion and Judgment are corrected as follows: The last full paragraph of the Opinion, which reads: “We will vacate the November 30, 2006 order of the District Court and remand this matter to the District Court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of PMC.” is deleted and replaced with:  “We will vacate the November 30, 2006 order of the District Court and remand this matter to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s Opinion.” The first sentence of the last full paragraph of the Judgment, which reads: “ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the order of the District Court be and hereby is vacated and the matter is remanded to the District Court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of PMC.” is deleted and replaced with: “ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the order of the District Court be and hereby is vacated and the matter is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s Opinion.” By the Court, /s/ Maryanne Trump Barry Circuit Judge Dated: April 29, 2008 lwc/cc: Jeffrey G. DiAmico, Esq. Francis J. Sullivan, Esq. Christopher M. DiMuro, Esq. T. Michael Wall, Esq.