Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Langford, 06-2774 (2008)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 06-2774 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 28, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-28-2008 USA v. Langford Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 06-2774 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008 Recommended Citation "USA v. Langford" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1487. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1487 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United Stat
More
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-28-2008 USA v. Langford Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 06-2774 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008 Recommended Citation "USA v. Langford" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1487. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1487 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 06-2774 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAWN LANGFORD, Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of PA (D.C. Criminal No. 05-cr-00151-2) District Judge: Honorable Gary L. Lancaster Argued November 2, 2007 Before: RENDELL, WEIS and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. ORDER AMENDING OPINION At the Court’s direction, it is hereby order that the opinion filed on February 22, 2008 in the above referenced case be amended in order to correct certain formatting issues present in the dissenting opinion. The Clerk shall file an amended opinion. The amendment does not change the or alter the substance of the opinion and this Court’s judgment. For the Court, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Dated: February 28, 2008 tmk/cc: Robert L. Eberhardt, Esq. Rebecca R. Haywood, Esq. Kimberly R. Brunson, Esq. Renee Pietropaolo, Esq.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer