Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Christopher Waterman, 08-2543 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 08-2543 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jun. 24, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-24-2009 USA v. Christopher Waterman Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 08-2543 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "USA v. Christopher Waterman" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1096. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1096 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opi
More
Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-24-2009 USA v. Christopher Waterman Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 08-2543 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "USA v. Christopher Waterman" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1096. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1096 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT May 28, 2009 No. 08-2543 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. CHRISTOPHER WATERMAN (D. Delaware Criminal No. 07-cr-00073-001) Present: RENDELL, AMBRO and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. 1. Motion by Appellant to Publish Opinion dated May 12, 2009. /s/ Timothy McIntyre Case Manager 267-299-4953 ORDER The motion requesting that the prior opinion be issued as a precedential opinion is granted. The panel has made several changes to the original opinion for purposes of clarification. Ordinarily, the precedential opinion would be filed as of the date of the original not precedential opinion. However, in light of the modifications to the original opinion, the now precedential opinion will be filed as of the date of this order. The changes to the opinion do not alter the prior judgment of the Court. The judgment remains filed as of May 12, 2009. By the Court, /s/Marjorie O. Rendell Circuit Judge Dated: June 24, 2009 DWB/cc: Shawn A. Weede, Esq. Edson A. Bostic, Esq. Brian Crockett, Esq. Tieffa N. Harper, Esq.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer