Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Olhovsky, 07-1642 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 07-1642 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 05, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-5-2009 USA v. Olhovsky Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 07-1642 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "USA v. Olhovsky" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1279. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1279 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United State
More
Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-5-2009 USA v. Olhovsky Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 07-1642 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "USA v. Olhovsky" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1279. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1279 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 07-1642 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICOLAU OLHOVSKY, Appellant (D.N.J. 06-cr-00263) Present: MCKEE, RENDELL and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges 1) Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Opinion dated April 16, 2009 2) Response by Appellant Nicolau Olhovsky in Opposition to Appellee’s Motion to Amend the Opinion dated April 23, 2009 3) Reply by Appellee USA to Appellant’s Response dated April 24, 2009 ________________________________ORDER_______________________________ In consideration of the Appellee’s foregoing motion, and the Apellant’s response thereto it is hereby ordered that Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Accordingly: the opinion of this Court issued in this case on April 16, 2009 is hereby AMENDED as follows: Footnote 20 is stricken from the opinion and each of the remaining footnotes are therefore renumbered accordingly. By the Court, /s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge Dated: May 5, 2009
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer