Filed: Feb. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-4-2009 USA v. Randy Baker Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-4577 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "USA v. Randy Baker" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1926. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1926 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the Un
Summary: Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-4-2009 USA v. Randy Baker Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-4577 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "USA v. Randy Baker" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1926. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1926 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the Uni..
More
Opinions of the United
2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
2-4-2009
USA v. Randy Baker
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 07-4577
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009
Recommended Citation
"USA v. Randy Baker" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1926.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1926
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-4577
___________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RANDY CLARK BAKER
Appellant.
___________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Criminal No. 06-cr-00432)
District Judge: The Honorable A. Richard Caputo
___________
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
October 30, 2008
BEFORE: McKEE, NYGAARD, and SILER,* Circuit Judges.
(Filed: February 4, 2009)
*Honorable Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court
of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
___________
OPINION OF THE COURT
___________
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Randy Clark Baker, entered into a plea agreement with the
Government, whereby he agreed to plead guilty to one count of unlawful possession of
child pornography. A presentence investigation report was prepared and defense counsel
filed a sentencing memorandum requesting a sentence outside and below the advisory
sentencing range. The District Court sentenced him to 78 months’ incarceration and a
special assessment of $100. We will affirm.
Because we write exclusively for the parties who are familiar with the facts and the
proceedings below, we will not revisit them here. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), Baker’s appointed counsel has examined the record, concluded that
there are no non-frivolous issues for review, and has requested permission to withdraw.
We, too, have thoroughly examined the record and can find no non-frivolous
issues to be raised in this appeal. Hence, we will affirm the judgment of the District
Court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
2