Michele Black v. County of Montgomery, 15-3399 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 15-3399
Visitors: 35
Filed: Sep. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-3399 _ MICHELE OWEN BLACK, Appellant v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY; DET. JOHN T. FALLON; LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP; DET. GREGORY HENRY; BRYAN GARNER; CHIEF FIRE OFF. CHARLES MCGARVEY; DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL FRANK HAND; STATE TROOPER ROBERT POMPONIO _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa. No. 2-14-cv-06702) District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody _ Argued on June 8, 2016 Before:
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-3399 _ MICHELE OWEN BLACK, Appellant v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY; DET. JOHN T. FALLON; LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP; DET. GREGORY HENRY; BRYAN GARNER; CHIEF FIRE OFF. CHARLES MCGARVEY; DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL FRANK HAND; STATE TROOPER ROBERT POMPONIO _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa. No. 2-14-cv-06702) District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody _ Argued on June 8, 2016 Before: C..
More
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 15-3399
____________
MICHELE OWEN BLACK,
Appellant
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY; DET. JOHN T. FALLON;
LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP; DET. GREGORY
HENRY; BRYAN GARNER; CHIEF FIRE OFF. CHARLES
MCGARVEY; DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL FRANK
HAND; STATE TROOPER ROBERT POMPONIO
____________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania
(E.D. Pa. No. 2-14-cv-06702)
District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody
____________
Argued on June 8, 2016
Before: CHAGARES, KRAUSE,
and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed August
30, 2016 is hereby amended to correct a typographical error
in that the word “not” was omitted from the sentence
appearing at pages 12-13 of the opinion. The sentence as
corrected should read:
We noted that unlike the “significant pretrial
restrictions” imposed in Gallo, the plaintiffs’ liberty in
DiBella was restricted only during their municipal
court trial and that merely attending trial does not
amount to a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes.
Id.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Dated: September 16, 2016
CJG/JK/cc: All Counsel of Record
2
Source: CourtListener