Filed: Jul. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-1172 _ LAURENCE KAPLAN, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SAINT PETER’S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM; RONALD C. RAK; SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual; GARRICK STOLDT, an individual; JOHN and JANE DOES 1–20 Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, Ronald C. Rak, Susan Ballestero, Garrick Stoldt, Appellants _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-1172 _ LAURENCE KAPLAN, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SAINT PETER’S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM; RONALD C. RAK; SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual; GARRICK STOLDT, an individual; JOHN and JANE DOES 1–20 Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, Ronald C. Rak, Susan Ballestero, Garrick Stoldt, Appellants _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No...
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 15-1172
_____________
LAURENCE KAPLAN, on behalf of himself,
individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
v.
SAINT PETER’S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM;
RONALD C. RAK; SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual;
GARRICK STOLDT, an individual;
JOHN and JANE DOES 1–20
Saint Peter’s Healthcare System, Ronald C.
Rak, Susan Ballestero, Garrick Stoldt,
Appellants
________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Civil Action No. 3-13-cv-02941)
District Judge: Honorable Michael A. Shipp
________________
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States
on July 7, 2017
Submitted on Remand July 7, 2017
Present: McKEE, AMBRO, and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges
_____________________________ ORDER __________________________________
By opinion and judgment dated June 5, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States
ordered the judgment of this Court entered December 29, 2015 be reversed. Advocate
Health Care Network, et al. v. Stapleton, et al., __ U.S. __,
137 S. Ct. 1652 (2017).
In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court, the opinion and judgment of this
Court are hereby vacated. It is further ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment
of the District Court dated March 31, 2014 is hereby reversed. Costs are taxed in favor of
the Appellants.
By the Court,
s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
ATTEST:
s/Marcia M. Waldron,
Clerk
Dated: July 13, 2017