Filed: Jul. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ Nos. 15-4053, 15-4094 & 15-4095 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BINYAMIN STIMLER, Appellant in No. 15-4053 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov JAY GOLDSTEIN, Appellant in No. 15-4094 UNITED STATES OF AMEREICA v. MENDEL EPSTEIN, Appellant in No. 15-4095 _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D. C. Nos. 3-14-cr-00287-005, 3-14-cr-00287-003 and 3-14-cr-00287-001) District
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ Nos. 15-4053, 15-4094 & 15-4095 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BINYAMIN STIMLER, Appellant in No. 15-4053 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov JAY GOLDSTEIN, Appellant in No. 15-4094 UNITED STATES OF AMEREICA v. MENDEL EPSTEIN, Appellant in No. 15-4095 _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D. C. Nos. 3-14-cr-00287-005, 3-14-cr-00287-003 and 3-14-cr-00287-001) District J..
More
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
Nos. 15-4053, 15-4094 & 15-4095
_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
BINYAMIN STIMLER,
Appellant in No. 15-4053
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JAY GOLDSTEIN a/k/a Yaakov
JAY GOLDSTEIN,
Appellant in No. 15-4094
UNITED STATES OF AMEREICA
v.
MENDEL EPSTEIN,
Appellant in No. 15-4095
_______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D. C. Nos. 3-14-cr-00287-005, 3-14-cr-00287-003
and 3-14-cr-00287-001)
District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson
________________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The Clerk has been informed of a typographical error in the amended opinion
which was filed on July, 17, 2017. Specifically, Justice Blackmun’s name is misspelled
in footnote 94 on page 34 of the opinion. The opinion is hereby amended to correct the
misspelling in footnote 94 as follows:
The mere fact that the two other individuals were allowed
to plead to violations of other statutes does not persuade us
otherwise; prosecutors have broad discretion in deciding what
to charge and what pleas to accept. See Bordenkircher v.
Hayes,
434 U.S. 357, 368 n.2 (1978) (Blackmun, J.,
dissenting).
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: July 19, 2017
CJG/cc: George T. Vickers, Jr.
Jerome A. Moschetta, Esq.
David R. Fine, Esq.
J. Nicholas Ranjan, Esq.