Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16-1969 JEFFREY WORKMAN, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI; DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA (E. D. Pa. No.2-14-cv-02957) SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING Present: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges The petition for rehearing filed by appellees in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the petitio
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16-1969 JEFFREY WORKMAN, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI; DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA (E. D. Pa. No.2-14-cv-02957) SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING Present: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges The petition for rehearing filed by appellees in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the petition..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16-1969 JEFFREY WORKMAN, Appellant v. SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI; DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA (E. D. Pa. No.2-14-cv-02957) SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING Present: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges The petition for rehearing filed by appellees in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. The opinion and judgment entered September 11, 2018 are hereby V A C A T E D.1 A subsequent opinion and judgment will be issued. 1As the merits panel has vacated the prior opinion and judgment, action is not required by the en banc court. BY THE COURT, s/ Julio M. Fuentes Circuit Judge Dated: October 30, 2018 CJG/cc: Marshall L. Dayan, Esq. Lisa B. Freeland, Esq. Susan E. Affronti, Esq. Catherine B. Kiefer, Esq.
