Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: AMENDED ALD-169 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 19-1168 _ IN RE: RUBEN MITCHELL, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2:09-cr-00105-001) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. April 25, 2019 Before: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and BIBAS, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 18, 2019) _ OPINION* _ PER CURIAM Earlier this year, federal pri
Summary: AMENDED ALD-169 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 19-1168 _ IN RE: RUBEN MITCHELL, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2:09-cr-00105-001) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. April 25, 2019 Before: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and BIBAS, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 18, 2019) _ OPINION* _ PER CURIAM Earlier this year, federal pris..
More
AMENDED ALD-169 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 19-1168
___________
IN RE: RUBEN MITCHELL,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2:09-cr-00105-001)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
April 25, 2019
Before: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and BIBAS, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: June 18, 2019)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Earlier this year, federal prisoner Ruben Mitchell filed a pro se mandamus
petition, asking us to direct the United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania to adjudicate his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 case. Thereafter, on May 10, 2019, the
District Court denied Mitchell’s request for § 2255 relief. The District Court reaffirmed
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
that denial on May 17, 2019, after receiving supplemental briefing from Mitchell.
Because Mitchell has obtained the relief that he seeks in his mandamus petition, we will
dismiss the petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.,
77 F.3d 690,
698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that
eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from
being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).
2