Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Debbie Williams and Linda Stanley, Cross-Appellants v. William R. Butler v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Third Party Appellant/cross-Appellee, 83-2534 (1985)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 83-2534 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 13, 1985
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 762 F.2d 73 Debbie WILLIAMS and Linda Stanley, Plaintiffs/Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. William R. BUTLER, Defendant, v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, Third Party Defendant Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 83-2534, 83-2641. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1985. Decided May 13, 1985. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, William R. Overton, U.S.D.C. Judge. 1 Thomas Carpenter, Little Rock, Ark., for third party defend
More

762 F.2d 73

Debbie WILLIAMS and Linda Stanley, Plaintiffs/Appellees
Cross-Appellants,
v.
William R. BUTLER, Defendant,
v.
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, Third Party Defendant
Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 83-2534, 83-2641.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 1985.
Decided May 13, 1985.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, William R. Overton, U.S.D.C. Judge.

1

Thomas Carpenter, Little Rock, Ark., for third party defendant appellant, cross-appellee.

2

Philip Kaplan, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs, appellees, cross-appellants.

3

Before LAY, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HEANEY, BRIGHT, ROSS, McMILLIAN, ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, en banc.

ORDER

4

The district court's decision is affirmed by an equally divided court. Chief Judge Lay, and Judges Floyd R. Gibson, Heaney, Bright, and Arnold vote to affirm the district court's decision. Judges Ross, McMillian, John R. Gibson, Fagg, and Bowman vote to reverse the district court's decision.

5

Appellee Williams' request for attorney fees is granted, with the following modification. Because appellee did not prevail on the punitive damages issue, the cost for services rendered will be reduced ten-percent to $8,055.00. The appellee's request for expenses in the amount of $1,068.79 is granted. Thus, the total award for fees and expenses allowed by the court is $9,123.79.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer