Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

88-1687 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 88-1687 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 27, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 865 F.2d 592 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1894 , 1 A.D. Cases 1418 DAVIS, Joel R., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated v. MEESE, Edwin III, Individually and in his capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, Webster, William H., Individually and in his capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States of America. Appeal of Joel R. DAVIS. No. 88-1687. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued Jan. 10, 1989. Decided Jan. 2
More

865 F.2d 592

48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1894, 1 A.D. Cases 1418

DAVIS, Joel R., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
v.
MEESE, Edwin III, Individually and in his capacity as the
Attorney General of the United States,
Webster, William H., Individually and in his capacity as
Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and the United States of America.
Appeal of Joel R. DAVIS.

No. 88-1687.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 10, 1989.
Decided Jan. 27, 1989.

Stephen F. Gold (Argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Vaughan Finn (Argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civ.Div., Washington, D.C., Virginia R. Powel, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Atty's. Office, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, COWEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Van Artstalen, reported at 692 F. Supp. 505 (E.D.Pa.1988).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer