Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Janet Williams. United States of America, 91-3353 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 91-3353 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 11, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 963 F.2d 567 20 Media L. Rep. 1232 In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Janet WILLIAMS. United States of America, Appellant. Nos. 91-3353 to 91-3356. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. May 11, 1992. Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 This matter having come before the court in banc pursuant to this court's Internal Operating Procedure 9.4.1, it is hereby 2 ORDERED
More

963 F.2d 567

20 Media L. Rep. 1232

In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Janet WILLIAMS.
United States of America, Appellant.

Nos. 91-3353 to 91-3356.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

May 11, 1992.

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This matter having come before the court in banc pursuant to this court's Internal Operating Procedure 9.4.1, it is hereby

2

ORDERED that the order of the district court dated May 8, 1991, 766 F. Supp. 358, quashing the subpoenas duces tecum to Janet Williams and the Pittsburgh Press Company, Michael Bucsko and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, WPXI, Inc., and Westinghouse Broadcasting Company, Inc., t/d/b/a KDKA-TV to produce documents before the Grand Jury be, and the same is, hereby affirmed by an equally divided court.

3

Each party shall bear its own costs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer