Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crestar Bank, Formerly Known as United Virginia Bank v. Larry M. Lefkowitz Barbara M. Lefkowitz v. Wolpoff & Abramson, Third Party, 95-1186 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 95-1186 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 20, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 59 F.3d 165 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. CRESTAR BANK, formerly known as United Virginia Bank, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry M. LEFKOWITZ; Barbara M. Lefkowitz, Defendants-Appellants, v. WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, Third Party Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-1186. United States Co
More

59 F.3d 165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

CRESTAR BANK, formerly known as United Virginia Bank,
Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Larry M. LEFKOWITZ; Barbara M. Lefkowitz, Defendants--Appellants,
v.
WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, Third Party Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-1186.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Larry M. Lefkowitz, Barbara M. Lefkowitz, Appellants Pro Se. Ronald Scott Canter, WOLPOFF & ABRAMSON, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order remanding this case to the state court from which they sought to remove it. A district court order remanding a case to the state court from which it was removed generally is not appealable. 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1447(d) (West 1994); see Nutter v. Monongahela Power Co., 4 F.3d 319, 321 (4th Cir.1993). Because none of the exceptions apply here, we dismiss the appeal from the remand order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer