Filed: Jun. 16, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 894 Joseph A. Chenkin v. Department of the Army, Headquarters U.S. Army Laboratory Command, U.S. Army Laboratory Command, Inspector General NO. 94-7109 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 16, 1995 Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 93-cv-00494, Caldwell, J. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordi
Summary: 61 F.3d 894 Joseph A. Chenkin v. Department of the Army, Headquarters U.S. Army Laboratory Command, U.S. Army Laboratory Command, Inspector General NO. 94-7109 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 16, 1995 Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 93-cv-00494, Caldwell, J. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordin..
More
61 F.3d 894
Joseph A. Chenkin
v.
Department of the Army, Headquarters U.S. Army Laboratory
Command, U.S. Army Laboratory Command, Inspector General
NO. 94-7109
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 16, 1995
Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 93-cv-00494,
Caldwell, J.
2
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)