Filed: Jun. 30, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 61 F.3d 895 David A. Jones v. University of Pittsburgh, a Pennsylvania Educational Corporation, Davis B. Bobrow, John O. Bolvin, Lawrence J. Korb, Lee F. Weinberg NO. 94-3631 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 30, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01021, Lee, J. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parti
Summary: 61 F.3d 895 David A. Jones v. University of Pittsburgh, a Pennsylvania Educational Corporation, Davis B. Bobrow, John O. Bolvin, Lawrence J. Korb, Lee F. Weinberg NO. 94-3631 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. June 30, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01021, Lee, J. 1 AFFIRMED. 2 Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the partie..
More
61 F.3d 895
David A. Jones
v.
University of Pittsburgh, a Pennsylvania Educational
Corporation, Davis B. Bobrow, John O. Bolvin,
Lawrence J. Korb, Lee F. Weinberg
NO. 94-3631
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 30, 1995
Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 91-cv-01021,
Lee, J.
2
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
