Filed: Apr. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: HLD-001 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 12-3603 _ IN RE: TARIREEF WHITE, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Related to D. Del. Crim. No. 07-cr-00123 and Civ. No. 10-cv-00132) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. November 2, 2012 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and BARRY, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: April 16, 2013) _ OPINION _ PER CURIAM Petitioner Tarir
Summary: HLD-001 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 12-3603 _ IN RE: TARIREEF WHITE, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Related to D. Del. Crim. No. 07-cr-00123 and Civ. No. 10-cv-00132) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. November 2, 2012 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and BARRY, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: April 16, 2013) _ OPINION _ PER CURIAM Petitioner Tarire..
More
HLD-001 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 12-3603
___________
IN RE: TARIREEF WHITE,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
(Related to D. Del. Crim. No. 07-cr-00123 and Civ. No. 10-cv-00132)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
November 2, 2012
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and BARRY, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: April 16, 2013)
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
Petitioner Tarireef White filed a petition for writ of mandamus on September 27,
2012, asking us to order the District Court to render a decision on his motion to vacate his
sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
By order entered on March 18, 2013, the District Court dismissed White’s § 2255
motion and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Because White has now
received the relief he requested in his mandamus petition—a decision on his § 2255
motion—we will deny his mandamus petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny
Ludlum Corp.,
77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
2