UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6946 HAYWOOD L. PEELE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MACK JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; RANDALL LEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-98-108-5-F) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: November 3, 1999 Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Haywood L. Peele, Appellant Pro Se. William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Haywood L. Peele seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no re- versible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Peele v. Jarvis, No. CA-98-108-5-F (E.D.N.C. June 25, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2