Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Stoddard, 99-7171 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7171 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 10, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7171 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALDEANER LEE STODDARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-221, CA-98-3099-6-13) Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aldea
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7171 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALDEANER LEE STODDARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-221, CA-98-3099-6-13) Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aldeaner Lee Stoddard, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Aldeaner Lee Stoddard seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Stoddard, Nos. CR-97-221; CA-98-3099- 6-13 (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer