Filed: Nov. 23, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2038 BERNARD A. FUREY; ROMANA FUREY, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 98-7244) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard A. Furey, Romana Furey, Appellants Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Murra
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2038 BERNARD A. FUREY; ROMANA FUREY, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 98-7244) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard A. Furey, Romana Furey, Appellants Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Murray..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2038 BERNARD A. FUREY; ROMANA FUREY, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 98-7244) Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 23, 1999 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard A. Furey, Romana Furey, Appellants Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Murray S. Horwitz, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Bernard and Romana Furey appeal from the tax court’s orders dismissing their petition for lack of prosecution and denying their motion to vacate. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. See Furey v. Commissioner, No. 98- 7244 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
