Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Miller v. Pasquotank Corr, 99-7164 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7164 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 21, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7164 GARY LEWIS MILLER, Plaintiff- Appellant, versus PASQUOTANK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JAMES B. HUNT, JR., Governor; DANIEL L. STIENEKE, Di- rector of Prisons; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-394-5-F) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7164 GARY LEWIS MILLER, Plaintiff- Appellant, versus PASQUOTANK CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JAMES B. HUNT, JR., Governor; DANIEL L. STIENEKE, Di- rector of Prisons; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-99-394-5-F) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 21, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Lewis Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Gary Lewis Miller appeals the district court’s order dismiss- ing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v. Pasquotank Correctional Institution, No. CA-99-394-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 1999). We deny Miller’s motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer