Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Odom v. College of Charles, 99-7448 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7448 Visitors: 41
Filed: Dec. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7448 CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON BOOKSTORE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-98-3528-2-23BC) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished p
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7448 CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON BOOKSTORE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-98-3528-2-23BC) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 30, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Patrick Corrigan, III, GRIMBALL & CABANISS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. The district court dismissed his complaint for failure to name specific defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Odom v. College of Charleston Bookstore, No. CA-98-3538-2-23BC (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer