Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vinson v. Ellis, 18-2170 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 18-2170 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jan. 28, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7072 DEREK LEE VINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY ELLIS; LYNNE ANN BATTAGLIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1549-JFM) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Lee Vinson
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7072 DEREK LEE VINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY ELLIS; LYNNE ANN BATTAGLIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1549-JFM) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Lee Vinson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Derek Lee Vinson appeals the district court’s orders dismiss- ing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com- plaint, denying his motion for reconsideration, denying his motion for recusal, denying his motion to vacate the district court’s memorandum and order of dismissal, and denying as moot his motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Vinson v. Ellis, No. CA-99-1549-JFM (D. Md. June 9, July 1, July 7, July 23 & Aug. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer