Filed: Feb. 02, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1973 MARK MOYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BIANCA RICCHIONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-125-MC) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 2, 2000 Before WILLIAMS,* MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Moyers, Appellant Pro Se.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1973 MARK MOYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BIANCA RICCHIONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-125-MC) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 2, 2000 Before WILLIAMS,* MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Moyers, Appellant Pro Se. U..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1973 MARK MOYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BIANCA RICCHIONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-125-MC) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 2, 2000 Before WILLIAMS,* MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Moyers, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). * Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM: Mark Moyers appeals the district court’s order of his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moyers v. Ricchione, No. CA- 99-125-MC (D.S.C. June 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. We also deny Moyers’ motion to remand. AFFIRMED 2
