Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gainey, 99-7603 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7603 Visitors: 31
Filed: Feb. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7603 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ONTARIO LAMAR GAINEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-68, CA-99-89-4-H) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7603 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ONTARIO LAMAR GAINEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-68, CA-99-89-4-H) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ontario Lamar Gainey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ontario Lamar Gainey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. The basis for the claim Gainey seeks to raise was known to him at the time of sen- tencing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal because the § 2255 motion was not timely filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer