Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Flint v. Painter, 99-7657 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-7657 Visitors: 41
Filed: Feb. 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7657 CHARLES RICHARD FLINT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus HOWARD PAINTER, Acting Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-98-691-5) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7657 CHARLES RICHARD FLINT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus HOWARD PAINTER, Acting Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-98-691-5) Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Richard Flint, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell v. McGraw, Jr., Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIR- GINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Richard Flint appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion adopting the report and recommendation of the mag- istrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Flint v. Painter, No. CA-98-691-5 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer