UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7486 ANTHONY EUGENE BAILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR FREUND, Medical Agent of the Richmond City Jail; LIEUTENANT WOMACK, Assistant Super- visor, Medical Agent of the Richmond City Jail; DOCTOR THOMPKINS, Medical Agent of the Richmond City Jail; CAPTAIN MINION, Super- visor, Medical Agent of the Richmond City Jail, Defendants - Appellees, and NURSE SMITH; NURSE PARRISH, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-924-2) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Eugene Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Chandra Dore Lantz, HIRSCHLER, FLEISCHER, WEINBERG, COX & ALLEN, Richmond, Virginia; Elizabeth Stanulis Skilling, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony Eugene Bailey appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bailey v. Freund, No. CA- 97-924-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1999). We deny Bailey’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2