Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jimmie Jones, 99-4746 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-4746 Visitors: 45
Filed: Mar. 01, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4746 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMIE ALLEN JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-95-20) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4746 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMIE ALLEN JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-95-20) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David W. Frame, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Melvin W. Kahle, Jr., United States Attorney, Thomas O. Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jimmie Allen Jones appeals the judgment order of the district court sentencing him to three-years’ imprisonment based on Jones’ violation of his supervised release terms. Jones claims that the court relied on improper hearsay evidence and that its findings were not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Our inde- pendent review of the record reveals no error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer