UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7518 EMORY ALVIN MICHAU, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BRUCE ORR, Detective, Charleston County Sheriff's Office; JERRY JELLICO, Detective, Charleston County Sheriff's Office; MR. TANNER, Detective, Charleston County Sheriff's Office; CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART- MENT; CHARLESTON COUNTY; SERGEANT TAGUE, Charleston County Sheriff's Office; DETECTIVE BUHLE, Charleston County Sheriff's Office; DETECTIVE HALE, Charleston County Sheriff's Office; DETECTIVE TITTLE, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Defendants - Appellees, and JACK GUEDALIA, Magistrate of Charleston County; LEROY LINEN, Magistrate of Charleston County, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-442-2, CA-96-443-2) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emory Alvin Michau, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John J. Blincow, Jr., David Wright Overstreet, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Emory Alvin Michau, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com- plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Michau v. Orr, Nos. CA-96-442-2; CA-96-443-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2