Filed: Apr. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2571 GARY L. DETEMPLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-131-5) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2571 GARY L. DETEMPLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-131-5) Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affir..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2571
GARY L. DETEMPLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois
Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-93-131-5)
Submitted: April 13, 2000 Decided: April 19, 2000
Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary L. DeTemple, Appellant Pro Se. John Lyle Allen, Samuel Hood
Foreman, BACHMANN, HESS, BACHMANN & GARDEN, Wheeling, West Virgin-
ia; Eric Simon Lipsetts, William G. Jepsen, Jr., Annapolis, Mary-
land, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gary L. DeTemple appeals the district court’s order granting
Allstate’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no abuse of
discretion. See Brodziak v. Runyon,
145 F.3d 194, 196 (4th Cir.
1998) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm on the reason-
ing of the district court. See DeTemple v. Allstate Ins. Co., No.
CA-93-131-5 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2