Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Adeyinka v. Mayor and City, 99-2221 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 99-2221 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 24, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2221 ABAYOMI ADEYINKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH, BALTIMORE CITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1459-WMN) Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: April 24, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Ju
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2221 ABAYOMI ADEYINKA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH, BALTIMORE CITY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1459-WMN) Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: April 24, 2000 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abayomi Adeyinka, Appellant Pro Se. James Stewart Ruckle, Jr., Allyson Murphy Huey, OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Abayomi Adeyinka appeals the district court’s order entering summary judgment for Defendants in this action alleging discrim- ination in failure to promote. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Adeyinka v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. CA-98- 1459-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer