Filed: May 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2346 COLETTE TAMANGWA, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order for the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-780-546) Submitted: March 20, 2000 Decided: May 19, 2000 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, Silver Spring, Mary- land, for Petitioner. Dav
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2346 COLETTE TAMANGWA, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order for the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A72-780-546) Submitted: March 20, 2000 Decided: May 19, 2000 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, Silver Spring, Mary- land, for Petitioner. Davi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2346
COLETTE TAMANGWA,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order for the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-780-546)
Submitted: March 20, 2000 Decided: May 19, 2000
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, Silver Spring, Mary-
land, for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Erin Albritton,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Collette Tamangwa petitions for review from the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (Board) order denying her motion to reopen
deportation proceedings to allow her an opportunity to apply for
relief from deportation under the United Nations Convention Against
Torture. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s decision and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion to reopen. See Stewart v. INS,
181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir.
1999); M.A. v. INS,
899 F.2d 304, 307-10 (4th Cir. 1990). We deny
Tamangwa’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2