Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Perkins v. Creecy, 00-6169 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-6169 Visitors: 23
Filed: May 18, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6169 BENJAMIN WALKER PERKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES M. CREECY, JR.; RICK JORDAN; QUENTIN FUTRELL; MR. REID, #1 Kitchen Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-968-5-BR) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judge
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6169 BENJAMIN WALKER PERKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES M. CREECY, JR.; RICK JORDAN; QUENTIN FUTRELL; MR. REID, #1 Kitchen Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-968-5-BR) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Walker Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Benjamin Walker Perkins appeals the district court’s order de- nying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Perkins v. Creecy, No. CA-98-968-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer