Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Green v. Dupree, 00-6351 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-6351 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 17, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6351 DENNIS I. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN T. DUPREE, JR.; HENRY V. BARNETTE, JR.; JANICE M. COLE; KIERAN SHANAHAN; BILL WEBB; FRANK JACKSON; JOHN R. SIMPSON; ANTHONY SULESKI; STEPHEN J. HUSK; MARY JACKSON; LYNN CAWLEY WILSON; LARRY JONES; ARTHUR MARKS; NANCY E. DAVIS; GEORGE W. KELLY; WILLIAM I. BERRYHILL, JR.; KAREN THOMAS; TONI L. DEPAUL; MACK JARVIS; J. BAKER WILLIAMS; MS. MENSHEW; MR. HOY; R. BOSTIC;
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6351 DENNIS I. GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FRANKLIN T. DUPREE, JR.; HENRY V. BARNETTE, JR.; JANICE M. COLE; KIERAN SHANAHAN; BILL WEBB; FRANK JACKSON; JOHN R. SIMPSON; ANTHONY SULESKI; STEPHEN J. HUSK; MARY JACKSON; LYNN CAWLEY WILSON; LARRY JONES; ARTHUR MARKS; NANCY E. DAVIS; GEORGE W. KELLY; WILLIAM I. BERRYHILL, JR.; KAREN THOMAS; TONI L. DEPAUL; MACK JARVIS; J. BAKER WILLIAMS; MS. MENSHEW; MR. HOY; R. BOSTIC; J. T. HAYWOOD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-571-CT-5-H) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 17, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis I. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; William McBlief, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Dennis I. Green, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief upon his pro se petition for writ of mandamus under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Dupree, No. CA- 99-571-CT-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer