Filed: Jul. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4848 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCUS HAWTHORNE BANKS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-351-A) Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark J. Rochon,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4848 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCUS HAWTHORNE BANKS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-351-A) Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 12, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark J. Rochon, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4848
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARCUS HAWTHORNE BANKS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-351-A)
Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 12, 2000
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark J. Rochon, ROCHON, ROBERTS & STERN, Washington, D.C., for Ap-
pellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Richard M.
Rolwing, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Marcus Hawthorne Banks alleges that the district court erred
by denying his motion to downwardly depart by imposing his sen-
tences for possession with intent to distribute heroin and posses-
sion of heroin by a prisoner to be concurrently served with his
previously imposed sentence. Because the district court concluded
that even if it had authority to downwardly depart it was unwilling
to do so, Banks cannot appeal the decision. See United States v.
Brock,
108 F.3d 31, 33 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v. Bayerle,
898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2