Filed: July 26, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1203 (CA-00-15-2) Sherry D. Battle, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Charles Studds, etc., et al., Defendants - Appellees. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed July 19, 2000, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 5 -- the panel information is corrected to read: “Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.” For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk  UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1203 SHERRY D. BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES STUDDS, Individually and in his offi- cial capacity as Chief Magistrate for the City of Norfolk; CITY OF NORFOLK; RALPH HAMLIN; KEITH DAVIES; D. A. NEWMAN, Individually and in their official capacities as Sergeants for the Norfolk Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-15-2) Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sherry D. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Sherry D. Battle appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction entered on October 20, 1999. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Battle v. Studds, No. CA-00-15-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3