Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McCoy v. Caldera, 00-1448 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1448 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 02, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1448 GEORGE C. MCCOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the Department of the Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-843-17BC-3) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 2, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1448 GEORGE C. MCCOY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the Department of the Army, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-843-17BC-3) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 2, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George C. McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: George C. McCoy appeals from the magistrate judge’s order* granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his complaint alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Caldera, No. CA-99-843-17BC-3 (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 2000). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to have the case tried by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer