Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hunter v. Attorney General, 00-6753 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-6753 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 07, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6753 BURN’ARD HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL, In his individual and offi- cial capacities, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-214-7) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6753 BURN’ARD HUNTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL, In his individual and offi- cial capacities, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-214-7) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Burn’ard Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36. PER CURIAM: Burn’ard Hunter, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as provided in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and agree that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reason- ing of the district court. See Hunter v. Attorney General, No. CA- 00-214-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer