Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tavakoli-Nouri v. Natl RR Passenger, 00-1992 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 00-1992 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1992 KAMRAN TAVAKOLI-NOURI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a/k/a Amtrak; MICHAEL BIBLEHIMER; MARILYN C. BROOKHARDT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99- 3632-AMD) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1992 KAMRAN TAVAKOLI-NOURI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a/k/a Amtrak; MICHAEL BIBLEHIMER; MARILYN C. BROOKHARDT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99- 3632-AMD) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri, Appellant Pro Se. Patricia McHugh Lambert, Stuart Alan Schadt, Sheri Nicole Green, HODES, ULMAN, PESSIN & KATZ, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Kamran Tavakoli-Nouri appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tavakoli- Nouri v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. CA-99-3632-AMD (E.D. Va. July 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer