Filed: Oct. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1369 BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONSBANK OF DELAWARE, NA; BARRY E. GORDON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 00-618-CCB) Submitted: August 22, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1369 BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NATIONSBANK OF DELAWARE, NA; BARRY E. GORDON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 00-618-CCB) Submitted: August 22, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1369
BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONSBANK OF DELAWARE, NA; BARRY E. GORDON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
00-618-CCB)
Submitted: August 22, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barbara Michelle Bush, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Barbara M. Bush appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her civil complaint against NationsBank. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and
deny all pending motions. See Bush v. NationsBank of Delaware,
N.A., No. CA-00-618-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 10, 2000).* We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the order from which Bush appeals was filed on
March 3, 2000, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet
on March 10, 2000. March 10, 2000 is therefore the effective date
of the district court’s decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and
79(a); see also Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.
1986).
2