Filed: Oct. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2152 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCDONALD’S RESTAURANT, Incorporated; MCDONALD RESTAURANT; ALL MCDONALDS CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-00-2438-WMN) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2152 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCDONALD’S RESTAURANT, Incorporated; MCDONALD RESTAURANT; ALL MCDONALDS CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-00-2438-WMN) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Ci..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2152 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCDONALD’S RESTAURANT, Incorporated; MCDONALD RESTAURANT; ALL MCDONALDS CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-00-2438-WMN) Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ellis Harley Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ellis Harley Barber appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barber v. McDonald’s Restaurant, Inc., No. CA-00-2438-WMN (D. Md. filed Aug. 17, 2000; entered Aug. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
